Insights

The #1 financial objective

Written by:
headshot of Chris H. Volk
Christopher H. Volk

Maximizing shareholder value: The #1 financial objective every leader should chase

Peter Drucker gave us Management by Objectives in 1954, in which he set forth an elegant idea:

Set clear, measurable goals, align individual and organizational performance around them, and hold people accountable to results. 

Its legacy is visible everywhere today – in KPIs, in OKRs, and in the performance dashboards that populate every modern business. But there's an objective missing from most of those dashboards, because it's misunderstood. And I would argue it’s the #1 financial objective every business leader should be chasing…

The case for a single overriding objective

Most leaders track multiple financial metrics simultaneously, including revenue growth, margin, EBITDA, return on investment, which, of course, are all useful, but without a single overriding objective, they can pull you in different directions. 

A business can grow revenue while destroying margin. It can improve margin while starving investment. And it can hit EBITDA targets while insidiously eroding long-term value. The objective that resolves this tension is straightforward to state, but much harder to internalize: 

Maximize shareholder value in excess of creation cost.

Not maximize revenue. 

Not maximize short-term earnings. 

Not maximize the equity valuation multiple. 

Maximize the value created above what it cost to build the business in the first place.

The metric for measuring this is what I build across The Value Equation. It’s a formula that computes the current yield on equity creation cost using six variables.

Why current equity return is the right starting point

The current rate of return on equity sits at the center of the Value Equation because it connects to every meaningful form of investor return.

A higher current return increases the capacity to pay dividends. It increases the compounding potential when cash is retained and reinvested into growth. It makes external growth more feasible (because issuing new equity to fund expansion requires a business model strong enough to absorb that investment without diluting existing returns). 

And it creates the conditions for multiple expansion, where the market assigns a higher value to future cash flows.

The one source of return the current rate doesn't directly capture is same-store, same-business-line cash flow growth. But even that is enabled by a business model generating returns worth reinvesting.

The important caveat

Here's where I usually see this go wrong as it plays out: 

Leaders assume that maximizing the current equity return is the objective, which isn’t quite right. Higher returns can be manufactured through excessive pricing, extracting value from customers in ways that erode volume and loyalty over time. 

They can also be manufactured through aggressive cost-cutting that hollows out the business's ability to grow. Both produce a number that looks good today and destroys value tomorrow.

The goal, therefore, isn't the highest possible return. It’s the most value created above creation cost. That distinction is why the Value Equation treats the current return as a lens rather than a target.

Walmart illustrates what this looks like at scale:

Between 2001 and 2020, the company grew steadily, generated enormous free cash flow, and remained one of the most dominant businesses in the world. Yet over that same period, it lost an estimated $145 billion in Equity Market Value Added as returns on reinvested capital declined. Shareholders still earned modest returns so the business never looked broken from the outside. But the underlying engine of value creation was weakening because capital was being reinvested at diminishing returns. 

From Drucker's dashboard to a better one

The Value Equation doesn't replace KPIs, it simply gives them all a roof to sit under. Sales growth, margin improvement, capital efficiency, and OPM optimization are variables inside the equation – levers that leaders can pull to improve value creation.  The equation organizes the work, rather than simplifying it,  making clear which actions contribute to the overriding objective and which merely produce the appearance of progress.

Next, we’ll explore what those levers actually are…

And how to start pulling them.

This is what I cover here, in my book The Value Equation, and through The Value Equation YouTube channel. Follow along as we break down the discipline required to become business rich.